a reply

1. Increased Black turnout was motivated by Obama's being Black. That's just a democracy thing. Normally I wouldn't care but Obama looks like a deceiver. And he ran on a platform of appeasement of Arab Supremacism (in my words). He'd bring the US military down, he said as much himself.

2. I never claimed a majority of muslims are militant. Majority is usually silent, and will follow whoever gets the upper hand in inner societal struggle for power and control. Germans were not all genocidal, but they followed their silver tongued Glorious Leader and his pack of wolfs. Right now the militants have upper hand in almost all Islamic / Arab societies, with their intolerance and the ingrained Arab Supremacism.

3. Hitler's central gospel was "to break free from the constraints" (to use Obama's words about Constitution) of Christian morals. His central grievance against the Jews was that they "invented Christianity" with its non-resistance ethics in order to subdue "the gentiles".

Yes, that's what he really believed. He was all for "social Darwinism", "survival of the fittest" - and his was a "master race". The Nazis' was a scientific antisemitism, it was a "racial" "science" now, not a religion, following a great 19th century tradition of "scientific" racial "theory" and antisemitism in France (following on some comparative linguistics discoveries of previous decades leading to the rise of a concept of Indo-European language group, and hence, group of ethnoses, or peoples - i.e. "race").

Of course the Nazis used the Christian antisemitism history to gain followers, but that was not their creed.

Hitler was NO Christian. In fact he said, if he HAD to pick a religion, it would've been Islam, because it's a warrior creed. Grand Mufti Hajj Amin (his name be destroyed) Huseini was his ally, a friend, and some say a central instigator of mass-killings of the Jews.

I don't mean no disrespect, but you ought to read more. You're just connecting the dots obviously ( Europe's thousand years of Christian antisemitism ... Nazi antisemitism) but it's not good enough. You have to have facts, in order to reach a proper conclusion.

4. Bible/Koran difference is theory vs. practice. In Bible it's all theory, in Islam the supremacy of Islam is the TODAY's commandment. And it IS followed, TODAY.

5. Israel may have been thought of as dumping point by European masters, but the Jewish people have dreamt of returning to their Historic Homeland for the last 2000 years, each and every year of it, saying each day in their prayers about going back to Jerusalem (i.e. Zion). The creation of Jewish state in the Land of Israel is an affair of the Jewish people. The Jews never demanded the displacement of the Arabs, the one and only thing they demanded was freedom of immigration. But the Arabs fought off because they weren't ready to become just free and equal citizens, they wanted their Supremacy preserved. It's the Islamic Supremacy thing.

BTW there were some tolerant Arab factions who wanted cooperation and peaceful coexistence, but the British had aided the most violent and intolerant ones, headed by the same Mufti (whom they themselves installed on his post in 1925). In the 1936-39 Arab revolt they killed more tolerant Arabs than they killed Jews, but after that the only surviving political thought in Palestina was of the most militant, intolerant kind - that's the "divide and control" British policy in action. The British had also aided the fanatical intolerant Wahhabi king of Saud over the tolerant and more progressive and peaceful Hashemite royal house in Arabia (which since then became the Saudi, Wahhabi, Arabia).

The very first Arab anti-Jewish riot and slaughter in 20th century Jerusalem was in 1920. Look it up under "1920 Arab riots". Their chant - as they brandished their swords and put them to good use slaughtering some Jews - was "Falastyn aradna, yahood kalabna", meaning, Falastyn's our land, Jews are our dogs. They might've accepted some Jewish immigration, but only as a second class citizens, the "dhimmi", as is demanded by the Sharia code, and was always the practice of Muslims over the conquered lands/peoples.

The point is, it ain't no "palestinian" land. It is the Land of Israel (Judea), renamed by the Romans in 132 CE into Palestina after the Second Jewish Revolt was crushed with mass murders and deportations. The Arabs invaded only in 638 CE. Since the 16th century it was part of Ottoman Empire. It was never an "Arab" land, there were no "Arab" country in it, and Jerusalem was never no capital of no Arab entity, EVER. It isn't even mentioned in the Koran, ONCE. These Arab claims to Jerusalem are a bogus invention in support of the Arab Supremacy ideology which is the real heart of Islam/Arab culture.

> That’s like the Germans dumping Koreans in California and expecting Americans not to complain.

That's very unfair thing to say. I cry foul.

The proper analogy would be "the Americans dumping the Irish in Northern Ireland and expect the English not to complain".

6. Islam does mean "submission". Internally, it's submission of the believers to GOD. Since no-one has access to HIM, it's the submission to clergy and/or the "sacred" books. Externally, it's the submission of all the unbelievers left alive, to the believers, in the name of rule of GOD on Earth, the Sharia Law.

The heart of Islam is COERCION into this submission. The believers aren't allowed to tolerate "mischief" in the land. There should reign "submission" to the will of GOD on Earth - as they see it, of course, according to the Koranic teachings - and that means, the submission of all the unbelievers to the rule of the believers, in the name of GOD, in accordance with HIS rule book of Law - as is preached in Islam.

If this submission was left to the personal choice of any individual, it'd make it a religious thing - and yes, it is in the Judaism/Christianity too, simply because Judaism is the source for all the rest of them - historically. But the COERCION makes it into a political thing, a thing of war and conquest, and of resistance to this war and that conquest.

The point Islam is making, it's not about to leave such an important thing to the personal choice of no "individuals". No, Islam takes charge.

It's no "Be good, Do no evil" like it's in Christianity, the personal commandment.

It's "Command good, Forbid evil" in others as well as in yourself (if not more so) - a collectivist, tribal creed.

See? The COERCION.

BTW it is so in Judaism too, it's just that in Judaism it is all turned ONLY INWARD, for the Jewish community only. That's what you're citing, it's the commandment for the Jewish community, inside the Land of Israel. Christianity has abolished all that. Judaism shuns on conversion and wants nothing to do with the "gentiles". Also, Judaism has much evolved since then, and is weak now internally in the Israeli society, tolerating the ruling secularism. Even if that commandment were followed it would only be a problem for the Jews themselves, and not for anyone else.

But Islam by its very definition of following the perfect example of "the last prophet" isn't allowed to evolve, and wants everything to do with everyone else in its reach. To evolve would be a heresy, at least to the today's winning fundamentalist faction in Islam. And Islam is obsessed with converting everyone, with Islam ruling the whole world, turning it into the Dominion of Islam, Dar-el-Islam.

Everything else is Dar-el-Harb, the Realm of War.

Some "peace" religion THAT is.